7950x vs 7950x3d reddit. 7950x3d clocks 5. I think base freq matters more than cache size for compilation, but look for compilation benchmarks to be sure. 7950X3D is a dual use (not concurrently) CPU for people doing productivity and gaming, 7950x does better for concurrent loads. Quite simply, matrix math is a lot faster on GPUs than CPUs. I am currently planing on getting a Ryzen 9 7950X but at CES AMD announced that the 7950X would get a X3D Variant. I read that you can decrease the performance of 7950x to 5% and decrease TDP to 50%. Game set to Very High quality in 4k. This is an oversimplification, and oversimplified statements like this are a big part the problem we're having with the discussion around these asymmetric CPUs. I currently use the Threadripper 3970X, but it's primarily a workstation that I game on. • 5 days ago. In terms of average framerate they're about equal, but the 1% lows are better on the 7800X3D. Its so good that the 5800X3D competes with more expensive CPU's for the same/similar performance. DDR5-6000 CL40-40-40-40-80-144. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 5. Some Results from Benchmarking a DDR5 Ramdisk vs Gen 4 NVMe. Productivity: for the most part a power limited 7950x. AMD’s own slides show the 7950X3D is better than the 13900K in productivity benchmarks such as +52% better 7Zip compression, +11% better Passmark 10 3D Graphics score. 7950X3D short review from actual home user. You can game an stream on a 8c cpu for the most part. I was originally going to no-brain it and go straight for the 7950x, but, after I did some digging around, it turns out the 5800x3d slaughters pretty much every zen 4 cpu and trades blows with the 7950x, at almost half the cost and half the power Which GPU are you going to pair with it, and which games do you like playing, at what resolutions? The reason people are suggesting the 7800x3d over the 7950x3d is because the 7950x3d is a complicated expensive overkill piece of technology for 99% of users. 13900k scales almost the same way as 7950x. I'm a visual FX artist so I would use this computer for simulation work as well as video encoding. For efficient mining, using ‘eco mode’ (or, better, ‘PPT’) to limit power consumption, with the same curve optimizer offset, and the same vcore, the two Mar 5, 2023 · On paper, we’re looking at a 68W peak power reduction (42% less) for the 7950X3D compared to its vanilla 7950X counterpart. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at Amazon for $576. Currently a 7900x and 13900k are roughly equal, with the 13900k having a slight edge. The reason is due to the core architecture design. Prices for 13th gen and base Zen 4 are lower now than launch, which was 6 months ago for Zen 4. Only until next year when it gets replaced by the 8950x and/or the 5090ti haha. you also should give the sff case 7950x vs 7950x3D for sff Proxmox Build Question Wondering if anyone can give me some advice on a new small proxmox build that will host my current windows setup as something I use sometimes for work and a few Linux distros (One being my daily driver for development (Fullstack Dev, GoDot, Microservices etc)) and containers for testing. The 13900K runs very hot and power hungry. Or you could just get a 7800X3D, which is literally just a 7950X3D without the second CCD. However, it is power-hungry and tends to run hot. Tldr; For gamer, this CPU suck and overpriced in “Price Per Performance turbo clock speed. Basically the CPU will hit 95C, no matter the cooler. 7950X3D is not CPU for everybody because official AMD solution just does not make any sense. The Intel chips will easily blow through 320W and thermal throttle even on 360 AIOs. Mar 7, 2023 · List price. I've reflaired this as a rumor as this benchmark is suspect. Thanks in advance. Turns out thats not completely true. And it's absolutely great, trully. the Intel 13900K/KS with 7200+MHz DDR5 may be the fastest at some games that prefer frequency over cache, and slightly faster than the 7950X3D at productivity and about the same Well just built a new system with a 7950x3d don’t get the hate because it’s the best of both worlds high clocks if you need it or 3dvcache for games. Best. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4. Music production. So my question: Is anybody out there who has access to CS2 and is able to compare the performance of the 13900k vs. 6 GHz. Half of the cores of a 7950X3D are literally just a 7800X3D, if you want it today. X3D will beat X gaming, and beat 7900x in productivity for aforementioned use scenario. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Currently have a 3970x setup with 128GB ram, 6x SSD and 4090 FE. buildapc. Discussion. 7GHz. Hello, Ill mainly use PC with those 2 CPUs for homelabs, running 3-4-5 VMs in the same time, program in the same time etc. 1 Share. 65W PPT ~ 45W TDP (possibly) 45W PPT ~ 25W TDP (possibly) Not completely sure if the 65W PPT and 45W PPT are an accurate simulation of their TDP counterparts, predicting power consumption is very messy in the laptop space where these are usually used. I want the 3d for games. For example current PCPartPicker prices for the high end segments: 13900k: $569. Some applications do love the cache, but if a 13900k was faster than a 7950x most of the time the 7950x3d will still lose. It's overkill for gaming and streaming. Depending on how intense your workloads are, I would probably opt for a 13700K or a 7900X, maybe a 7950X if your V-Tuber software is very heavy. Both are great cpu’s it’s am5 longevity that swayed me towards amd. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. But since CS2 runs on Source2, there might be a difference. For your use case, the top end CPUs are a bad deal. The games where the 7950x3d wins by a lot, it is game changing and those games aren't likely to be reflected all that much in most reviews. The only reason a 7950X has more cache than, say, a 7900X is that it has more cores. Keeping some background processes on the normal When I tried to run 4x32GB DDR5, system would basically not boot with AMD EXPO, since it tried to run at 6000 MT/s but only around 3600 is possible with 4 sticks from my understanding. After thorough testing and many, many benchmarks and hours, I think I understand it. If you use a better method, such as the program Process Lasso, then the 7950X3D will be faster in all games than the 7800X3D, due to the slightly higher clock speeds. My single-core score is about 80% higher on 7950X vs 3960X. This will turn off core parking. However, if time is money, then the price difference doesn't matter as much as the saved time. The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. In 4K the difference will be minimal to close to non existent anyways A 7950x3d is, at absolute worst, a 7800x3d with a better bin + higher fmax limit + earlier release date. •. However, due to this scalability it is more expensive for the extra performance due to all the high-end parts like mobo and RAM being more expensive. The 7950x3d is almost as good as the 14900k, but I think it lags a bit in both gaming and productivity except in a few rare cases. But so is the 13900k (and the likes). Also for the 7950x3d nearly all other processes can be assigned to the non x3d ccd which also helps in gaming Performance. Get a water cooler, ideally 280mm minimum, 240m doesn't outperform most air coolers. 05ghz. A lower TDP is a good thing, though. Note that with Intel you can easily use 6400 ddr5 as well. I never throttled in games with 7950X3D, on The 7950X3D is better for gaming. Current build has a 4090 and the CPU will be hooked up to a 360mm AIO and have good case airflow so it'll be plenty cool enough. X3d is mostly beneficial in games, so if you don't care about that, and you don't care about the power efficiency, then 7950x is technically faster. Regardless, they are ridiculously more efficient. I'd wager that almost double the L3 cache from X3D cache from 7950X3D to 7800X3D will be the same. Take into account the extra cooling you need on the 13900k and the increased power costs, it becomes more expensive pretty quickly. A 13900ks likely gives a roughly 5% boost over the 13900k like we saw in the previous generation. 3970x vs 7950x/7950x3D. I've seen several sources claiming that the AMD 7950X (3D) is not that stable. the cheaper option. So before reviews and testing came out, i was almost completly decided on the 7950x3D. Not sure if true but high performance started moving task that were in frequency into cache Mar 5, 2023 · Our highest average power measurement for the 7950X3D weighed in at 149W, showing that the chip often runs below its official 162W peak power rating (PPT). What kind of RAM should I pair the 7950x3D with? On AMD website, it simply says DDR5-5200 But Hardware Unboxed recently reased a video where they paired Zen4 with a few different RAM and it gives significant differences: DDR5-6000 CL30-38-38-38-96-96 (Best apparently) DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-36-76-112. From my 5 mins of screwing around, the 7950X platform is only ~$90 more expensive than the 13900k platform. I could get new 7950X from local website for about $470 (Im from eastern EU), and Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $300 more expensive than 7950X I have found The extra L3 cache, thanks to the 3D Vcache, really woke up gaming performance for just about every game. The 48 core 7642 also scores better than the 7662. I really don't do a lot of pc gaming, and I don't do any of cpu-intensive work, but I've already purchased a 4090 and an AM5 motherboard, but I'm looking to find out how beneficial the 3d v-cache on the 7950x3d will be for games on the Index, Pico 4, and future VR gaming systems. 7800x3d is a traditional 8 core CPU with 16 threads, and all 8 cores have access to the 3d Vcache, which benefits games. Firstly the GPU doesn't have access to the L3 and therefore the vcache at all. Looking some input on Threadripper 3070 vs Ryzen 7000 series. 7950x vs 7950x3d I see what you mean (Benchmark and CPU details) The base clock is faster on the non-3d, but they are both at the same turbo clock of 5. + PBO and CO guide/referance. Intel Core i9-14900k: Appears to be more stable with fewer reported issues compared to the 7950X3D. Mainly because i'm impatient and the shops I buy from still don't have the 7950x3D. lexsanders. This review will focus on my using experience of the CPU. Wouldn't even consider 14900K unless you don't mind setting up a 360/420mm. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. AzysLla. Seems like AMD is expecting fierce competition to these. -7. 7950X is better. EDIT: to add, my NVME performance shot up by 30% as well, it's the same NVME drive I used in my 3960X. Probably not a 7900x is already so overkill for a game that old. Any insights or advice on which processor would better suit my needs would be greatly appreciated. It actually ruined my PC and after a required restart my PC wasnt booting anymore and was stuck. Both CPUs are perfectly stable with current BIOS updates and I never heard of anything like "amdip" as an AMD user. Sort by: Add a Comment. 7950x: $589. Page 1 : AMD has launched the $599 Ryzen 9 7900X3D, a 12-core CPU with a base clock of 4. R9 7950X vs R7 5800X3D for gaming. Depending on case used Arctic or EK make good coolers. Save some money and drop back one step to a 13700K (Intel) or 7800X3D (AMD) and get almost the same performance at much lower cost and lower power demand… plus, you can air cool a 13700k. Productivity - Its clocked lower than 7950 & 7950x and is handily beaten in every productivity test and comes in at higher price. But if I would get a consumer CPU then it would be the 7950X3D. However, there seems to be many issues with Easy Anti-cheat and running the game off a Ramdisk, such as Blackscreens or game not loading at all. 7950x3D has some issues in games 7800x3D is sometimes faster. This means that the X will outperform the X3D at the absolute extreme limit. The main thing is cooling and power consumption. Hi, there is a point waiting for the new 7950x3d except for gaming ? It's probably 20% faster in benchmarks or some dumb marketing shit. This requires you to disable the second CCD (which doesn't have 3D V-Cache) for the most gaming performance. Basically looking for a cpu which won't bottleneck my 7900 xtx. Honestly for gaming and streaming 7700x is all you need. $600. Sure the 4090 and 16c/32t + turbo is nice on the 7950x, but if the tasks you use aren’t utilizing the power of the 7950x then it might be worth it to hold off on an upgrade considering I use my 5900x as a workstation and even then it’s a bit overkill. Slightly lags behind the 7950X3D in terms of performance across various applications. The 7950X3D has two CCD's (core complex dies) which contain said cores, obviously. 360 AiO you won't go above 75°C - the CPU will take around 120W and will have almost same performance as 7950x with ~250W, which will start throttling, because of temperature. 88W PPT ~ 65W TDP. x3d is great for most games, but not all, and less so for productivity. There are quite a few games with a 10-20% difference. 192GB of DDR5-5200 running STABLE on 7950x self. And the CPU clocks go up as long as the CPU isn't getting any hotter and/or the CPU is not hitting power limit. The chip, which leverages AMD's second-gen 3D V-Cache to boost L3 capacity to 128MB, beats Intel's Core i9-13900K in gaming by 7%. Keep in mind, I both use my PC for gaming and work (Mostly Adobe apps like After Effects/Premiere) Currently my retailer has a lot of cashback Steps: CPPC in bios to AUTO (Which sets priority on frequency CCD and this can be seen acting like that on HWinfo) Game Mode turned off. Even with my cheap electricity, it's a ~$25 per year difference in electricity cost. I am conflicted whether I should wait for the X3D Variant or just go for the 7950X. Pick between either the 7950x or i9. 7600x3d 7700/7800x3d and 7950x3d are coming the 7959x3d will be 100 Dollars more than 7950. •• Edited. It's a combination of AMD basically killing best part of 7950X3D by core parking and reviewers not caring about Process Lasso. Considering a 7950x over a 7950x3D. The 7950x3d is a For what it's worth, the 13700k and 13900k are neck and neck with the 7950X3D in RPCS3, at least according to Tech Powerup. RabidMining. I wouldn't choose this unless max performance was the only real objective. itzBT. $700. Compatible with the AM5 chipset, which Open comment sort options. 142W PPT ~ 105W TDP. . $700 for CPU, $300 for MB, $600 for 128GB memory, plus $100 discount from Newegg. WOW probably doesn't use more than four cores. weird benchmark, the 5900X is ahead of the 5950X, Dual 16 Core 73F3 system is faster than a single 64 Core 7662. It has most of the performance of the 7950x for a lot lower price. Reply. But there are games that perform better with the 7950x3d stock than with a simulated 7800x3d. FluffyGreyfoot. Main blame is on Microsoft being too lazy to actually meaningfully support hybrid CPUs, Inter suffers in similar fashion. slavicslothe. It would also be my personal computer so I'd be using it for games too. Saying that, the 7950X is still CONSIDERABLY more efficient than anything Intel currently offers. I've got a 5950x running on a video encoding rig. and maybe sometimes game on it (gaming is the least important thing for me). The clock speed upgrade is great tho! I was hoping with the larger cache of the 7950X3D this would be remedied, but from a couple of review channels who bothered to do productivity benchmarks, the 3D version is slower. Has an unlocked multiplier. 13700KF: $349 (steal) 7900: $429. • 9 mo. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. ProfTheorie. I believe this is largely due to the 7950X3D being a 120W TDP chip in order to not overheat the V-cache on top of one of the CCD's, vs the normal 7950X running stock at 170W TDP. You might get one more cpu from the intel socket but 4-5 years from am5. It's a niche, within a niche product + enthusiast toy. After switching from 3960X to 7950X I can definitely feel the smaller cache when multi-tasking with a lot of programs open. Then I won't have problems with the E-cores and P-cores, and the 7950X3D has 16 equal cores over 8 P-cores the Intel has, not to mention, even a Threadripper is easier to cool than an Intel CPU. Not bad considering Zen 2 to Zen 3 netted zero gains. Everything that the 7800x3d can do, the 7950x3d can do better - and if it can use the second CCD, sometimes a lot better. The 14900k is going to be better at gaming than the 7800x3d is at productivity, although I believe there are a few exceptions. Hello everybody, I wanted to share my experience with the AM5 platform and the 7950X3D. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D in these non-gaming workloads was 11% faster than the Intel Core i9 13900K and at It's called 3D cache because that sounds better than piggyback. Pros of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (3D): Way more efficient than the 14900K. The typical behavior (make sure you install the chipset drivers) is to park the second CCD when you are in a game. Several games are 20-30% up from using the second CCD in addition to the first one. I'm very happy I made the switch. Almost any motherboard is fine. After clearing CMOS it finally started and I Another 7950x vs 7950x3d post. My thinking is theoretically a 7950x3d will give a 10% improvement in gaming, but a 13900ks will give a 5% improvement in productivity tasks on average. 7950X3D is really great for hybrid use. ago. It cost me $1500 total to switch. I saw some benchmarks for 4K gaming and it seems that the i9-13900K vs the 7950X3D are basically neck and neck. 3D have slightly worse singlecore & app performance, but it's more suitable for passive builds - eventhough I lowered voltages to Eco@105w, the performance is much above 5950X. 7950x3d? Cheers MoarCurekt. 7950X3D is king in low latency DAW benchmarks. 7950x3d for best work/gaming experience and superb number of cores/power consumption/perf mix (looks most risky) Same with poorer consumption and game experience (bit less risky) 7800x3d as a temp solution given 8000 series will come soon enough (relatively safest) I'm looking to use ASUS x670e ProArt and some slim 4090 (need all PCIE slots). the 7950X should be faster at productivity than the 7950X3D due to higher frequency on both CCXs, and equal with the 7950X3D at games that prefer frequency over cache. The problem is that only half of its cores have 3D V-Cache, meaning Windows can mess up the core prioritization. It is a gaming CPU first. Literally in same boat as you just bought the 7950x due to the black friday sale now i hear the rumors and im debating on returning as well for 7950x3d if real. I got a 7950x and had a d15 chromax already , it runs fine but as people say the cpu does go into the 90 to 95 range , it runs normally in the high 60s. In contrast, the 5800X/3D maintained the same 105W TDP limit for both 7950X or 7950X3D. 011v) and limited the settings to the same as the 5950x, just to see how it would compare. I'd transfer over the SSDs and video card. The x3d has a lot of better power efficiency, with e. Stick to the cheaper model and manually overclock it to 250 wats, you will have the best cpu for development. For example, a user review in this comparison page claims that the 7950X3D "is haunted by software bugs" ( here you have an example of a bug with AMD's CPU). It's also not worse than the 7950X in productivity, it's +/-1% in most cases. I don't use buffer sizes larger than 128 as there's a noticeable input delay, so the X3D was the right choice fo rme. One of the 7950x3D's CCUs has no special cache so 8 cores are just normal Ryzen 7000 cores. I read that you need to manually tweak it to work optimally, then I Would like to play some games, but I do not as for now so we will see, I am more focused on productivity and power efficiency ADMIN MOD. I thought got my build sorted, just waiting for last Black Friday deals, but then I was thinking if going with 7950x3d is good idea. If that its worth the upgrade for you, yes you will see a difference. This 7950X pulls 170W @ 22607 H/s. It is also efficient out of the box, unlike the 7950x. If I understood correctly the 7950x is slightly better in production due to higher clock boost frequency while the 3D version is better in gaming performance (but I'm not quite sure if at 1440p the difference is tangibile, I'm using a 3080 btw) I'm wondering if the difference in price is worth it 7950x is ~560 euros 7950x3D is ~670 euros 9. A 7950x can be set to a 75W power limit and still deliver 80% of the compute. g. If its worth the price difference is your decision. The 7900x and especially the 7950x are meant for workstation builds. Reply reply. The more complicated answer is, it does out of the box when AMD's chosen method of keeping games on the V-Cache CCD doesn't work. 7Ghz, so the 3d cache should be the only diff at load, hence the high score for same cores and speeds at turbo (load) but for some reason the non-3d still beats out per core over the 3d. YMMV of course. If I do get the 7950X3D, I plan on disabling the CCD that doesn’t have v-cache. I recently build fully passive PC with 7950X3D@128GB DDR5 for my DAW setup (FL Studio and ton of VSTs). They have a 3D version of their last gen too, maybe read the reviews on those to get an idea. 9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. 1. 7950x3d for VR gaming. as of now, it is known that the 13900k performs better than the 7950x3d in CS:GO. Although the 7900X3D's performance is strong, its high price means it is vulnerable Will the X3D version slow that down too much? The price difference is insignificant to me so that's not a factor to consider at this point. This means that AMD has stacked the It hasn't released yet. This CPU is niche. It also draws half the power (140W vs 282W) that the 14900K does - which means less heat, and therefore less noise. I got the 7950x and use the game mode on Ryzen master to use only 8 cores while gaming and Worldbosses, Raids and the City didnt drop with the 3d while the 7600x is falling below my fps limit. The cache is split between the 2 CCDs, one of which is basically the 7800X3D, the other one a "normal" 4 or 8 core utilising 32 MB L3 cache, so the performance in Factorio will be the same between 7800-, 7900- and 7950X3D. New CPU from AMD is impressive from the efficiency point of view: From the nearly 400 benchmarks, when taking the geo mean the 7950X3D was at 97% the performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X while on average being at 60% the power consumption rate. I imagine the 7950X3D's voltage curve is tuned more towards efficiency to keep the L3 cache cool, rather than sacrificing efficiency to beat Intel (as in the case of the 7950X). Archived post. I had heard a while back that the 7950x3d couldn't be overclocked. Online tests show that the 7950X3D is a very power efficient chip, able to perform almost the same as a 7950x but with 30% lower power consumption. For games in the middle the 7950x3d wins about half compared to the 13900k. If you don't do productivity work the extra 8 cores go to waste and you're better off with the 7800X3D price to performance wise. Power Plan balanced. Basically, the 7900x is the enthusiast or hobbyist work cpu. AMD’s chips on the other hand can be taken care of by a Noctua Air cooler and run absolute balls to the wall stock with PBO, leaving you extra room t When cache is hit, the 7950x3d usually flies away. 7950X3D is just a 7800X3D with 8 normal non-3D cores stuck on and with a higher price tag. Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. My 5950x was running with the usual optimisations, PBO on with some custom settings to limit heat and power a bit while undervolting the cores (per core) to get some decent performance out of it. You don’t need more than an r7 5800x in most cases tbh. Kinda itching on building a 7950x or a 7950x3D machine but worried it might not be worth the jump from my current setup. It's really up to you. EXPO was working perfectly fine until i installed Ryzen Master. I previously made a post analyzing the behavior of the 7950X3D. 2. I had to keep editing it from new information. Apart from the improved gaming performance of the 3D-version, I also like that it use a lot less power. If you're going to want something which is efficient there is no way around the 7950x running in eco mode or 7950x3d at stock while the x3d chip is even faster than the regular version. 7800X3D is the best for pure gaming, but if you want to open any other stuff during your game session, and especially if you stream your games, 7950X3D is the clear winner. There have been a few reviews that have proven this and worked around it. The difference in games is generally smaller than the difference in productivity. Both the Ryzen 9 7950X and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D are based on AMD’s Zen 4 architecture — but the latter comes with AMD’s 3D V-Cache. Ryzen 7950x vs 7950x3d. Maybe it helps some people in their decision making. Ryzen 9 7950x or 7950x3D. The extra cache improved 1% and 0. 25 ghz on the x3d ccd and the 7800x3d clocks 5. Similarly that applies to the 7950X3D - as it has 8 non-X3D cores which get cache, but not the super big chunk of X3D cache. We do need to see once we actually get benchmarks of the 7800x3d. In the same boat, except I am also a hardcore gamer and only develop on windows. 13900K vs 7950x3D vs 7950x. Air cooling is NOT enough for any of these chips. 7950X3D iGPU is 3-4x faster compared to 7950X with the same RDNA2 2CUs. you may not have to thermal limit the 7950x except if you are targeting a power envelope or having to avoid thermal throttling because of cooling deficiencies. Although, it seems that the 7950X3D only performs better then the i9-13900K in lower resolutions such as 1440p and 1080p. They are throwing everything the CPU has to offer to get all the performance out of these. 7950x would be very good for productivity. 3. No benchmark, No FPS, No Rendering Time/score. Due to major controversial of this CPU regarding how it's "work". Obviously if you lift the power limits the efficiency goes through the roof, but when PPTs are equal the difference is only ~5-10% in favor of AMD. Yes. Disappointments aside, Raptor Lake, in a year where AMD wasn't absolutely crushing it, is actually a huge improvement over the previous processors from Intel and pretty damn monumental jump over their previous stagnation. As a result, the X3D has a lower safe thermal limit (89C vs 95C for the X), and a lower max clock speed. 7950x would be the better option over x3d for most productivity applications. The 13900K still smokes any AMD CPU on the market when properly tuned by at least 15%, Intel just scales higher and have more potential than AMD. I did a quick and dirty undervolt on the 7950x (0. I think as drivers mature a little more and the scheduling gets fixed up these problems will disappear. These percentages based on other 7950X reviews are higher than the 7950X, which actually loses to the 13900K in Passmark 10. The 7950x3d is effectively a minimalistic better 7800X3D in gaming - the rest of the cores get parked and still it's faster than the 7950x in games. Linear extrapolation of this to 16 Cores/32 Threads would give in theory: 5700X: 176W = 19486 H/s (simply x2 the original numbers/hash rate, which would be a best case scenario) So looks to be ~ 15% more hash per Watt on the new gen. If you only use your computer for gaming, choose the 7800X3D. All Ryzen 9+ chips have two chip dies which are connected together using a technology called Infinity Fabric, so the cores on different complexe's can communicate. Generally speaking, the 7950x is a bit faster (3-4%), with slightly higher frequency and much higher power draw (250W vs 155W in Blender). I'd argue that at $699 the 7950x3D is overpriced, but we will have to wait for reviews. In order to keep background task on the first 8 priority cores. If it had one, though, it would be a great choice for an all round cpu. The much less power hungry 7950X3D or 7950X does not. I’d probably go with a 7700x or 14600k for all round use that isn’t power hungry like a 14900k or 7950x. 7800X3D is the gem of Zen4. Both 7950x and 7950X3D sit on top of Intel’s 13900k and 14900k chips in passmark. Don't get the 7950x3d, it's a waste of a chip. The 7950x3d is a bad choice until it gets a proper thread director. 4 GHz and an overclock speed of 5. The 7950X3D makes no sense if you aren't primarily gaming. 4. However, theres a bit of an issue with it from the reviews, which is that allegedly the 7950x3D doesnt do so hot when it lands the game on the non 3d cache cores, and the CPU does weird things to park the non 3d cores. I only use one fan with the d15 due to clearance issues with my case , i ordered a noctua industrial ppc 3000 as the 2nd fan and will report back on how it solves my issues. If i bought the 7950x, would I be able to easily cap the performance, around 5-10% and then get the same power consumption Maximizing 7950X3D performance. 1% fps lows for a far smoother and consistent frame rate. When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. hm pt tg rk qs pv yb yg qk dz